Note

    Project Compass Intake Dossier

    Retired operator dashboard and repository-intelligence experiment, useful as evidence for why current context layers emphasize source-backed checkpoints.

    Project Intake - Project Compass

    1) Executive Summary

    Retired operator dashboard and repository-intelligence experiment, useful as evidence for why current context layers emphasize source-backed checkpoints.

    This 1079 intake treats the project as killed and uses source-backed evidence rather than inferred live-product claims.

    2) Project Type and Domain

    • Project type: experiment
    • Status: killed
    • Trail: ai_ops
    • Domains: ai-ops, builder
    • 1079 posture: First-class killed dashboard experiment.

    3) Repository and Live URLs

    • Repository: maggielerman/project-compass
    • Local source: /Users/maggielerman/Github/project-compass
    • Live URL: Unknown unless separately documented in source files.

    4) Product/User Journey Summary

    The public reader should understand Project Compass through its source evidence, operational decisions, and artifact trail. The journey is not treated as a polished product tour unless source files and screenshots support that claim.

    5) Architecture and Stack Summary

    Architecture evidence comes from the source repo files listed below. The intake keeps stack claims conservative and marks any missing runtime or live URL evidence as an unknown.

    6) Key Workflows and Operational Flows

    • Source review and classification under Hyphenomenon project 1079.
    • Human/operator review of whether this repo is active, paused, killed, or supporting-only evidence.
    • Project artifact generation, validation, dry-run sync, and later apply only after status/trail metadata are preserved.

    7) AI Context: Prompts, Chats, Agent Workflows

    This project is part of a cross-repo AI-assisted intake batch. AI or automation claims are included only when the source repo itself documents agent, AI, automation, or workflow behavior.

    8) Supporting Docs and External Resources

    Hydration Source Artifacts

    SourceCanonical URLTypeHydration value
    README.mdGitHubmdPrimary source summary and workflow context.
    AGENTS.mdGitHubmdSupporting source evidence for this intake.
    ROADMAP.mdGitHubmdSupporting source evidence for this intake.
    CHANGELOG.mdGitHubmdSupporting source evidence for this intake.
    DOCS/README.mdGitHubmdPrimary source summary and workflow context.
    docs/README.mdGitHubmdPrimary source summary and workflow context.

    9) Screenshot Gallery (with relative links + captions)

    Source README and purpose Caption: Primary source summary and project posture.

    Repository structure and stack Caption: Source files, commands, and implementation structure.

    Operational and deployment evidence Caption: Deployment, docs, automation, or runtime evidence where present.

    Status and intake posture Caption: Git/source-state evidence plus 1079 classification.

    10) Candidate Import Nodes and Relationships

    • Candidate project slug: project-compass
    • Candidate project status: killed
    • Candidate trail: ai_ops
    • Related project slug: notion-project-dashboard-automation
    • Related project slug: dashboard-automator
    • Supporting evidence notes should preserve source excerpts, screenshots, and dry-run output.

    11) Risks, Gaps, and Unknowns

    • Live URL and current deployment state are unknown unless source evidence explicitly proves them.
    • The source repo may have dirty state, branch drift, or stale history; this dossier records inspected state rather than claiming production freshness.
    • Public representation must not promote killed or paused experiments as active work.

    12) Handoff Checklist for Hyphenomenon Import

    • Source artifacts created in the source repo.
    • Hydration payload extracted.
    • Dossier validated with required screenshots and project-page packet.
    • Dry-run sync captured under DOCS/intake/1079-cross-project-intake/project-compass/.
    • Local apply and route verification completed only after dry-run review.
    • Production apply held for explicit operator approval.